EPBC update: National Environmental Standards and next steps
The Federal Government is implementing its EPBC Act reforms in stages.
The NES are a key part of the reforms. The first four NES were made on 19 August 2026.
In this article, we summarise the four NES, explain how they apply and outline the next steps.
Where the reforms are up to | |
|---|---|
Completed | |
1 December 2025 | Environment Protection Reform Act 2025 (Cth) received Royal Assent. |
20 February 2026 | First tranche of amendments commenced. |
1 July 2026 | National Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA) commenced. |
19 August 2026 | First four NES were made. |
24 August 2026 | Second tranche of amendments and supporting regulations commenced. |
Scheduled by 1 December 2026 | |
By 1 December 2026 | The new approval tests: consistency with prescribed NES, no unacceptable impact and net gain. |
By 1 December 2026 | Streamlined assessment, replacing some existing assessment approaches. |
By 1 December 2026 | Bioregional planning. |
By 1 December 2026 | Supporting regulations (consultation closed on 13 October 2026). |
Beyond 1 December 2026 | |
Unknown | The First Nations Engagement NES. |
Targeted for mid-2027 | New and updated assessment bilateral agreements with the States and Territories. |
1 July 2027 | Exemption for forestry operations under Regional Forest Agreements ends. |
The NES are legislative instruments made by the Minister. Each NES sets objectives and outcomes, and the principles for achieving them. A NES binds a decision-maker only where the EPBC Act or Regulations require it.
Each NES explains how a decision-maker may be satisfied that a decision is consistent with it. In short, a decision-maker may be satisfied if the action, or the framework being accredited, meets the NES principles, having regard to the NES objectives and outcomes. For accredited frameworks, requirements that are in effect equivalent to, or higher than, the principles are also enough. The principles are a floor, not a ceiling.
Since 24 August 2026, the EPBC Regulations have applied all four NES to decisions to:
Three of the NES (all except Offsets) apply to declarations for National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority (NOPSEMA) frameworks for offshore petroleum and greenhouse gas activities. These requirements apply only to agreements, accreditations and declarations made or varied on or after 24 August 2026.
The NES do not yet apply to EPBC Act action approvals. That will change when the new approval tests commence (by 1 December 2026). From then, an action must not be approved unless the Minister or their delegate is satisfied the approval is consistent with any prescribed NES. The proposed regulations would prescribe all four NES for approval decisions.
A national interest proposal may be approved despite an inconsistency with a NES, if the inconsistency is reasonably necessary for the intended national interest outcome. Fossil fuel actions cannot be national interest proposals.
A decision-maker may have regard to any NES they consider relevant to a decision. The Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) and NEPA have both said the NES will not apply to assessment and approval decisions until the new tests start. Even so, proponents should expect the NES to inform what decision-makers regard as good practice.
Sets objectives for each type of protected matter, such as threatened species, Ramsar wetlands and World Heritage properties. Actions must apply the mitigation hierarchy (avoid, mitigate, repair, then compensate) and consider impacts in context. Residual significant impacts must be compensated, but only after avoidance, mitigation and repair have been reasonably exhausted. Some impacts cannot be offset at all and must be designed out. Proposals must be supported by appropriate evidence on impacts.
Applies where offsets compensate for residual significant impacts and deliver the required net gain. Offsets must be feasible, secure, tangible, measurable, additional, like-for-like and in a relevant area. Offsets must generally be secured, registered and under management before the impact occurs. For approval decisions, paying a restoration contribution charge can also satisfy this NES. The Offsets NES is not prescribed for NOPSEMA framework declarations.
Requires engagement to be planned, transparent and responsive, ethical and protective of privacy, and accessible and inclusive. One way to meet the planning principle is a published engagement plan and an invitation to comment open for at least 10 business days. Consultation should generally occur during project planning and design.
Requires data and information used for EPBC Act decisions to be representative, transparent, comparable, reusable and ethical. This includes respecting Indigenous cultural governance and protocols for culturally sensitive information.
Authors: Michael Voros, Partner; Gemma Witt, Senior Associate and Katrina Hall, Lawyer.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.