Chapter Nine: NYSE Listing Standards: Governance on the “Big Board”
While some of these requirements mirror those imposed by the SEC, these requirements are in fact independent obligations with separate ramifications if not met. An NYSE company and its counsel must ensure that the company satisfies both SEC and NYSE requirements.
This chapter reviews listing standards and rules applicable to companies listed on the NYSE, including:
What Is Independence? The NYSE Describes What It Is Not
A director who has any of the following relationships is not independent under NYSE standards:
Boards must evaluate contributions to charitable organizations as part of the director independence determination process. In addition, a listed company must publicly disclose contributions the company made to any charitable organization in which an independent director serves as an executive officer if within the past three years contributions in any single fiscal year exceeded the greater of $1 million or 2% of the charitable organization’s consolidated gross revenues. Some companies adopt a general category of relationships relating to director independence establishing that charitable contributions below a certain dollar amount do not constitute a material relationship for director independence purposes.
Executive Sessions
Listed companies are required to schedule “regular” executive sessions in which non-management directors meet without management participation. Non-management directors exclude company executive officers but include other directors who may not be independent because of a material relationship or other reason. A listed company may satisfy this requirement by holding regular executive sessions of only its independent directors. However, if a company regularly holds meetings of all non-management directors (and if that group includes any non-independent directors), then it should also hold an executive session of only independent directors at least once a year. We provide practical tips for organizing executive director sessions in Chapter 2.
The non-management (or independent, as the case may be) directors should either appoint a single presiding director for all executive sessions or rotate the presiding director position following a set procedure. Listed companies that have either an independent chair or a lead independent director usually name this person as the presiding director. Companies are required to publicly disclose the presiding director’s name or the procedure used to select the presiding director for executive sessions, as well as a method for all interested parties (not just shareholders) to communicate directly with the presiding director or with the non-management (or independent) directors as a group.
Audit Committee
Composition and Independence. NYSE listing standards generally require that listed companies have an Audit Committee that consists of at least three independent directors and meets SEC requirements. All Audit Committee members must meet two somewhat overlapping independence standards, one established by Sarbanes-Oxley and the other by the NYSE:
Financial Literacy and Expertise. Each member of the Audit Committee must be, or within a reasonable period of time following appointment must become, financially literate. In addition, at least one member must have accounting or related financial management expertise. The NYSE does not provide detailed definitions for these concepts; a listed company’s Board is expected to use its business judgment in interpreting these requirements. For example, the Board can presume that a person who meets the SEC’s Audit Committee financial expert standard has the requisite financial expertise to meet this NYSE standard. (We discuss the SEC’s Audit Committee financial expert standard in Chapter 2.)
Limitation on Multiple Audit Committee Service. Does an Audit Committee member serve on more than three public company Audit Committees? If so, the Board must decide whether these commitments impair the director’s ability to serve as an effective Audit Committee member, and the listed company must publicly disclose the determination. (Many companies’ corporate governance guidelines specifically restrict a director from simultaneously serving on more than three public company Audit Committees.)
Practical Tip: Have Four Qualified Audit Committee Members to Ensure Continued Listing Standards Compliance
As described above, the NYSE generally requires a company to have at least three qualified independent directors on the Audit Committee. Consider whether it makes sense for your company’s Audit Committee to have a fourth independent member so that your company remains compliant with this NYSE listing standard even when a member unexpectedly resigns, no longer qualifies or is removed, without having to scramble to appoint a new member on short notice.
Audit Committee Charter. The NYSE requires a listed company to have a written Audit Committee charter that addresses:
Practical Tip: Audit Committee Should Schedule Additional Meetings or Meet Later in the MD&A Review Process
To comply with NYSE listing standards and governance expectations generally, the Audit Committee must review and discuss a relatively advanced draft of the MD&A to be included in a listed company’s SEC filing, instead of simply discussing the MD&A disclosure in general. Accordingly, Audit Committee meetings should be scheduled to allow review of the MD&A disclosure in a form that is almost final. Meetings can be telephonic or in person.
Internal Audit Function. The NYSE requires each listed company to have an internal audit function. A company may outsource this function to a third party other than its independent auditor. The Audit Committee is generally responsible for oversight of the internal auditor.
Compensation Committee
Composition and Independence. NYSE listing standards generally require that listed companies have a Compensation Committee composed entirely of independent directors, but do not prescribe a minimum number of members. In addition, when determining the independence of a director who will serve on the Compensation Committee, the Board must specifically consider all relevant factors regarding whether the director has a relationship to the listed company that is material to the director’s ability to be independent from management with regard to Compensation Committee service, including:
Compensation Committee Charter. The NYSE requires a listed company to have a written Compensation Committee charter that addresses:
Nominating & Governance Committee
NYSE listing standards generally require that listed companies have a Nominating & Governance Committee composed entirely of independent directors. A minimum number of members is not prescribed. The Nominating & Governance Committee must have a written charter that addresses:
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The corporate governance guidelines required of each listed company allow the Board and senior management to publicly set out the key tenets of their company’s governance values. The guidelines must at least address:
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
Paired with the corporate governance guidelines is the NYSE-required code of business conduct and ethics—a practical set of ethical requirements for a listed company’s officers, directors and employees. Only the Board or a committee can waive violations of the code by directors or executive officers, and the company must disclose any of these waivers to its shareholders within four business days of the waiver.
An NYSE-compliant code of business conduct and ethics should address, at a minimum:
In reviewing a code of business conduct and ethics, the Board should consider whether the code provides for sufficiently practical and general compliance standards and procedures, so that the Board or a committee is not put in a position of regularly considering waivers.
Access to Corporate Governance Documentation
The NYSE calls for website posting of a listed company’s corporate governance guidelines, code of business conduct and ethics and core committee charters. A listed company must disclose the availability of these materials and the website on which the materials are located in its annual proxy statement (and other SEC filings). Companies use website postings both as a way to publicly communicate the “tone at the top” from the CEO and the Board and as a ready reference for employees, directors, investors and other stakeholders.
“Clawback” Policy for Erroneously Awarded Compensation
In connection with SEC rules adopted in late 2022 to implement Sarbanes-Oxley requirements, an NYSE-listed company must have a written policy requiring reasonably prompt recovery of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation from executive officers in the event the company is required to prepare a restatement of its financial statements due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements under the securities laws. In addition, the company must provide any disclosures relating to its recovery policy required under securities laws. A company cannot indemnify executive officers for loss of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation. (We discuss “clawback” policy-related matters in more detail in Chapter 7.)
The NYSE prohibits the initial or continued listing of a company that is not in compliance with the NYSE’s “clawback” policy requirements.
CEO’s Certification of Compliance with Corporate Governance Standards and Company’s Annual Written Affirmation Regarding Ongoing NYSE Obligations
A listed company’s CEO must annually certify to the NYSE that he or she is unaware of any (not only material) violation of the NYSE’s corporate governance standards, or otherwise detail any known violation. On an ongoing basis, the CEO must promptly notify the NYSE in writing if any executive officer of the company becomes aware of any noncompliance with the NYSE’s corporate governance standards, even if the noncompliance is not material. In addition, a listed company must file an annual written affirmation regarding ongoing NYSE obligations and may have to provide interim affirmations if various triggering events occur.
NYSE May Issue Public Reprimand Letters
The NYSE may issue a public reprimand letter to a listed company that it determines has violated any NYSE listing standard, whether regarding corporate governance or another matter. For companies that repeatedly or flagrantly violate NYSE standards, the reprimand could lead to trading suspension or delisting. (We discuss potential consequences of noncompliance with NYSE standards in more detail at the end of this chapter.)
Website Requirements
Listed companies are required to have and maintain a publicly accessible website. To the extent that the NYSE requires a listed company to make documents available on or through its website, the website must clearly indicate in the English language the location of documents on the website. These documents must be available in printable versions in the English language.
The NYSE believes that good business practice calls for a listed company’s management to consider submitting to shareholders those matters that may be important to shareholders, even if submission is not necessarily required by law or by governing documents. If a listed company has any questions about submitting a matter to its shareholders, the NYSE urges the company to reach out and discuss the matter with its NYSE representative as appropriate (including prior to entering into a transaction that may require shareholder approval). For the key corporate actions described below, however, the NYSE specifically requires shareholder approval.
Equity Compensation Plans
Subject to limited exceptions, shareholders must approve any new equity compensation plan (or arrangement), whether or not officers and directors can participate in the plan. Shareholders must also approve any material revision to an existing plan (or arrangement).
For purposes of the NYSE requirements, an equity compensation plan is a plan or other arrangement (e.g., a non-plan equity grant) that may provide equity securities (newly issued or treasury) of the listed company to any employee, director or other service provider as compensation for services.
The NYSE’s definition of material revision is general, but specifically includes:
Limited exemptions from the NYSE’s shareholder approval requirements for plans (or arrangements) include:
If a grant, plan or amendment is exempt from the NYSE’s shareholder approval requirements, the Compensation Committee (or a majority of the independent directors) must approve the grant, plan or amendment. In addition, the company must notify the NYSE in writing of the use of an exemption, and for any hiring inducement grant, issue a press release to disclose the material terms of the grant.
Practical Tip: Be Timely—Apply for Listing of Equity Compensation Plan Shares
It is good practice to file an application with the NYSE to list reserved and unissued shares in connection with a stock option, stock repurchase or other compensation plan prior to securities under those plans being issued, especially if an exemption is being relied on—even if technically such filing is not then required.
20% Stock Issuance
In most cases, shareholders must approve a listed company’s new issuance of common stock (or securities convertible into, or exercisable for, common stock) in any transaction (or series of related transactions) that could equal or exceed 20% of the outstanding common stock or 20% of the outstanding voting power before the new issuance. However, a public offering for cash (even if over these 20% limits) generally does not require shareholder approval, nor does a private sale of common stock for cash at a price at or above the common stock’s minimum price unless the sale is related to the acquisition of the stock or assets of another company and the related issuance of common stock (and any other issuances of common stock relating to the acquisition) could exceed the 20% limits. The NYSE defines “minimum price” as the lower of (1) the official closing price of the listed company’s common stock immediately prior to the signing of the binding agreement to issue the additional common stock; or (2) the average official closing price of the listed company’s common stock for the five trading days immediately prior to the signing of the binding agreement.
Issuances with Related Parties
In a non-cash transaction or in a cash transaction (or series of related transactions) at a price less than the minimum price, the NYSE generally requires shareholder approval prior to a company’s issuance of common stock (or securities convertible into, or exercisable for, common stock) of over 1% of the outstanding preissuance common stock or voting power to a director, officer, controlling shareholder or member of a control group or other substantial security holder (e.g., 5% or greater holders) having an affiliated person who is a director or officer of the company. In addition, prior shareholder approval is required if the common stock issuance is related to an acquisition of a company or assets where a director, officer or substantial security holder has a 5% or greater (or related parties collectively have a 10% or greater) direct or indirect interest in the company or assets or the consideration to be paid in the acquisition, and the related issuance of common stock (and any other issuances of common stock relating to the acquisition) could exceed 5% of the outstanding preissuance common stock or voting power.
Issuances in Change-of-Control Transactions
The NYSE generally requires shareholder approval prior to an issuance of securities that would result in a change of control of the listed company.
In general, the voting rights of an NYSE company’s current common shareholders cannot be disproportionately reduced or restricted through any corporate action or issuance, such as through capped or time-phased voting plans, issuance of super-voting stock or exchange of common stock for common stock with fewer voting rights per share. It is important to note, however, with regard to issuance of super-voting stock, that this restriction is primarily intended to apply to issuance of new classes of stock, so companies with existing dual-class capital structures generally are permitted to continue to issue any existing super-voting stock without conflict.
That said, an NYSE company (whether dual-class or not) wishing to enter into an arrangement that may disproportionately affect the voting rights of its current common shareholders (through stock issuance or otherwise) should carefully consider consulting with its NYSE representative early in the proposed transaction process, because even shareholder approval of the proposed transaction does not make it permissible without a prior “green light” from the NYSE.
The NYSE requires advance review and oversight of related party transactions for potential conflicts of interest by the Audit Committee or another independent body of the Board. For a related party transaction, the Audit Committee or other independent body of the Board must prohibit the transaction unless it determines that the transaction is not inconsistent with the interests of the company and its shareholders. With this advance review requirement, a company must carefully implement procedures to identify potential related party transactions and approve them before they occur.
To be consistent with SEC disclosure requirements, the NYSE defines “related party transactions” as those described in Item 404 of Regulation S-K (which covers the SEC’s definition of related person transactions). These transactions include those in which the company is a participant that involve over $120,000 and in which any director or nominee, executive officer or 5% or more shareholder, or any immediate family member of the foregoing, has a direct or indirect material interest. (We discuss related person transactions in more detail in Chapter 7.)
The NYSE reviews proxy statements and other public filings disclosing related party transactions, and where such situations continue for several years, the NYSE may remind the listed company of its obligation, on a continuing basis, to evaluate each related party transaction and determine whether it should be permitted to continue.
Other critical NYSE standards include:
A listed company’s investor relations officer or corporate secretary office should maintain close contact with the company’s NYSE representative. Communications with the NYSE are generally confidential. At a minimum, the company will need to notify and provide supporting documentation to the NYSE prior to, or at the time of, a number of corporate actions, including (in addition to those already mentioned) the following:
In making the disclosure decisions discussed in Chapter 5, a listed company must consider the NYSE’s requirement calling for prompt release to the public of any material news, whether it is to be provided in written form or orally, that might affect the market for the company’s securities. This obligation exists side by side with requirements imposed by securities laws and the SEC, and results in an affirmative disclosure obligation for NYSE companies that may not otherwise exist.
Material news consists of news or information that might reasonably be expected to have a material effect—favorable or unfavorable—on the market of a listed company’s securities, including information that might affect the value of the company’s securities or influence an investor’s decision to trade in the company’s securities. Events such as earnings announcements (or related changes, including date of announcement), dividend declarations, securities offerings, mergers and acquisitions, tender offers, major management changes, and significant new products or contracts may all qualify as material news.
Chapter 5 provides a more detailed list of factors that will help in deciding when news or information merits public release.
Exceptions to Required Public Disclosure
The NYSE permits a listed company to refrain from publicly announcing even material news, if necessary, as long as the company can maintain its confidentiality while still keeping all investors on equal footing and allowing no unfair information advantage. However, a company must take extreme care to keep the information confidential and to remind persons who possess the knowledge of their obligation to refrain from trading on insider information.
If a decision is made not to disclose material news, a listed company’s investor relations officer and general counsel’s office should closely monitor the price and trading patterns in the company’s securities and be prepared to make a public announcement if it becomes clear that the information has leaked to outsiders. If the NYSE detects unusual or suspicious trading activity in a company’s securities, the NYSE may contact the company, require that the company make the information public immediately or possibly halt trading in the company’s securities until the public has time to absorb the information.
Practical Tip: Those Pesky Rumors—What to Do?
Perhaps the greatest threat to the confidentiality of material news is a rumor that indicates the market is aware of the confidential information. In the event of unusual market activity or rumors indicating that investors already know about impending company events—for example, a possible acquisition—your company may be required to make a clear public announcement regarding the state of negotiations or the development of corporate plans relating to the rumored information. This may be required even if the Board has not yet considered the matter. If the rumors are untrue, you may need to issue a press release publicly denying or clarifying the falsehoods or inaccuracies. It is critical, of course, that you do not deny negotiations that are in fact occurring and that the statement be otherwise truthful and in compliance with antifraud laws.
When rumors do arise, you should first seek to confirm that they did not originate from within the company and, subject to conversations with the NYSE and as considered appropriate, issue a release speaking to the matters as discussed above or issue the sort of release that we discuss in Chapter 5 (i.e., a release stating that the company’s policy is not to comment on transactional rumors).
Procedures for Public Disclosure of Material News
The NYSE outlines the following steps a listed company should take when publicly releasing material news (including responding to rumors):
Trading Halts or Delays
The NYSE requires advance notice of potentially material news in part to determine whether the news would justify a trading halt or delay in the listed company’s securities. Companies generally may avoid temporary trading halts or delays related to the release of new material news by fully disseminating the information to the public well before trading begins. If the company believes that it may request a trading halt or delay in connection with the announcement of material news, the company should coordinate closely with the NYSE. Whenever the NYSE decides to halt or delay trading due to pending material news, it will make an announcement to the market to that effect. Once the company releases the material news, the NYSE will monitor the situation and commence trading pursuant to its normal trading procedures. If the pending material news is not released within a reasonable time after the halt, the NYSE will monitor the situation and may reopen trading (often after 30 minutes of the trading halt or delay) and signal that material news is still pending. In addition, when the NYSE believes it is necessary to request from a company information relating to material news, the NYSE may halt trading until it has received and evaluated the information.
The NYSE outlines the following potential consequences for a listed company in the event of noncompliance with its standards and rules:
When a company receives notice from the NYSE of any of the circumstances described above, a Form 8-K filing may be required. Companies in these circumstances should discuss with counsel how to best engage with the NYSE to avoid penalties, including potential trading suspension and securities delisting.
You can request a hard copy or download a PDF version.
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.