EU EMIR: ESMA consults on Article 7d reporting requirements
On 18 August 2026, ESMA launched a consultation seeking industry feedback on draft technical standards prescribing the content and format of the new Article 7d EU EMIR1 annual reporting requirement introduced by EMIR 32.
The new obligation requires in-scope clearing members and their clients to report annually on the products they clear through EU-recognised third-country CCPs (TC CCPs). At the date of this briefing, this includes (amongst others) LCH Limited, ICE Clear Europe Limited, and LME Clear Limited.
The consultation closes on 12 October 2026 and ESMA intends to submit final technical standards to the European Commission later this year.
EMIR 3 entered into force in December 2024 and introduced the Active Account Requirement, a new obligation designed to ensure that in-scope EU entities clear a proportion of their OTC derivatives transactions through EU CCPs.
As a complementary measure, EMIR 3 also introduced a new reporting obligation under Article 7d, which requires in-scope entities to report annually on their TC CCP clearing activity.
EU EMIR sets out, at a high level, the information that in-scope entities are required to report:
"(a) the type of financial instruments or non-financial instruments cleared;
(b) the average values cleared over one year per Union currency and per asset class;
(c) the amount of margins collected;
(d) the default fund contributions; and
(e) the largest payment obligation."
ESMA's consultation is seeking market input on supplementary technical standards specifying the scope and content of the Article 7d reports.
ESMA was originally tasked with preparing draft technical standards by December 2025, but this was postponed as part of a wider prioritisation exercise. In the interim, ESMA published a public statement in December 2025, confirming that the first report is not due until the necessary technical standards have been implemented.
The new reporting obligation applies to the clearing activity of (i) EU clearing members of TC CCPs and (ii) their EU clients. It also applies to the clearing activity of non-EU entities within an EU-consolidated group, with the EU parent responsible for reporting on a consolidated basis for all its subsidiaries.
"Client" in this context is defined as "an undertaking with a contractual relationship with a clearing member of a CCP which enables that undertaking to clear its transactions with that CCP".
Indirect clients (i.e. clients of clearing member clients) are not in scope.
The level 1 EU EMIR text requires EU parents of EU-consolidated groups to report the group's TC CCP clearing activity on a consolidated basis, including that of non-EU group members.
The draft technical standards propose that this information should be submitted in one single report, distinguishing between clearing activity undertaken by EU and non-EU group entities. The reporting entity would therefore need to provide different information for EU and non-EU subsidiaries, as additional reporting on initial margin is required in respect of non-EU entities. The consultation also requests feedback as to whether reporting on variation margin as well would provide meaningful insight.
The table below sets out the information required for each type of entity.
Unlike most EU EMIR provisions, the new reporting obligation extends beyond derivatives to the broader category of "financial instruments [and] non‑financial instruments". This encompasses cleared securities financing transactions (SFTs), securities and "non-financial instruments".
In practice, "non-financial instruments" are limited to spot contracts and crypto-assets (other than derivatives), as these are the only non-financial instruments in respect of which TC CCPs have been recognised to provide clearing services.
The draft technical standards propose that the following should be subject to the new reporting requirement where they are cleared through a TC CCP:
ESMA was required to take into account existing reporting channels when developing the draft technical standards, and to avoid duplicative reporting. It therefore conducted an extensive gap analysis to identify information that is already available to EU supervisors through other reporting regimes, including Article 9 of EU EMIR and the EU Securities Financing Transactions Regulation3.
As a result, the new reporting obligation will vary depending on the type of reporting entity, the clearing arrangement and the instruments cleared.
|
Entity / clearing member type |
Information to be reported |
In-scope instruments |
|---|---|---|
|
EU-established clearing member |
1. Category of instrument(s) cleared, from a choice of:
2. Type of instrument(s) cleared, from a choice of:
3. Asset class, from a choice of:
4. EU currency 5. Average value cleared over one year, per instrument, per currency and per asset class, based on aggregate month-end positions over the twelve-month period corresponding to the calendar year preceding the reporting date. 6. Average value cleared over one year, per instrument, per currency and per asset class that is attributable to non-EU entities, calculated as described in 5 above. |
All financial instruments except derivatives and SFTs (as these are reported under other reporting regimes)
All non-financial instruments
|
|
Non EU-established clearing member that is part of an EU-consolidated group |
As for EU-established clearing member (above) |
As for EU-established clearing member (above) |
|
EU-established client of (i) an EU clearing member or (ii) a non-EU clearing member that is part of an EU-consolidated group |
As for EU-established clearing member (above) |
As for EU-established clearing member (above) |
|
Non-EU client that is part of an EU-consolidated group and that clears through (i) an EU clearing member or (ii) a non-EU clearing member that is part of an EU-consolidated group |
As for EU-established clearing member (above) |
All financial instruments
All non-financial instruments
|
|
EU-established client of a non-EU established clearing member that is not part of an EU-consolidated group |
As for EU-established clearing member (above) PLUS
* The consultation also requests feedback as to whether reporting on variation margin as well would provide meaningful insight. |
All financial instruments
All non-financial instruments
|
| Non-EU entity that is part of an EU-consolidated group and is the client of a non-EU established clearing member that is not part of an EU-consolidated group |
As for EU-established client of a non-EU established clearing member that is not part of an EU-consolidated group (above) |
All financial instruments
All non-financial instruments
|
Article 7d(1) also mandates reporting on default fund contributions and the largest payment obligation. In practice these are only relevant at clearing member level, and ESMA’s gap analysis found that this information may be obtained from the annual data request to Tier 1 TC CCPs, so the draft standards do not introduce additional reporting for these items (hence they are not included in the table above).
The reporting obligation is annual, with the draft technical standards proposing a deadline of the last business day of January each year for reporting in respect of the preceding calendar year.
Proposed transitional provisions would provide that the first report date must be at least six months after the standards enter into force. Consequently, if the standards were to enter into force before 31 July 2027, the first report would be due by the end of January 2028. If not, it would be due by the end of January 2029. In any event, under ESMA's proposals the first report would need to cover all calendar years from 2025 up to the report date.
The consultation closes on 12 October 2026. ESMA is expected to submit the final technical standards for endorsement by the European Commission later this year.
Other author and key contact: Kirsty McAllister-Jones, Expertise Counsel
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.