Legal development

Dispute Resolution Insights – May 2026: The Impact of Geopolitical Events on the Regulatory Landscape in the UAE

    Overview

    In this article, we examine how the current geopolitical environment in the Middle East is reshaping the UAE's anti-money laundering (AML), counter-terrorism financing (CFT) and counter-proliferation financing (CPF) landscape, particularly in the context of the UAE's 2026 FATF mutual evaluation.

    The article is of direct relevance to those operating in or through the UAE, including financial institutions, virtual asset service providers, and corporates with regional exposure. It provides a practical guide to the heightened regulatory expectations arising from the convergence of the regional conflict, the new Federal Decree-Law No. 10 of 2025 (the New AML Law), and the strengthened 5th round FATF evaluation methodology.

    Since being placed on the FATF grey list in March 2022 and subsequently removed in February 2024, the UAE has undertaken significant legislative and institutional reforms. However, the 2026 evaluation will apply a more rigorous effectiveness-based methodology that prioritises demonstrable outcomes over documentary compliance. The regional conflict has further intensified scrutiny on counter-terrorism financing, proliferation financing and sanctions implementation.

    Key Takeaways

    1. Effectiveness over compliance – The 5th round FATF methodology requires firms to evidence that their AML/CFT/CPF controls are producing measurable outcomes, not merely that policies exist on paper.
    2. AML Reforms – Federal Decree-Law No. 10 of 2025 (the New AML Law) introduces a number of reforms including personal criminal liability for managers, fines of up to AED 100 million, and a lowered legal threshold for establishing principal offences (such that knowledge of illicit funds may now be inferred from objective circumstances).
    3. Geopolitical context sharpens focus areas – The regional conflict and the UAE's role as a major financial and trade hub gives rise to increased scrutiny as to how effectively UAE-based firms identify and disrupt terrorism and proliferation financing flows and implement sanctions obligations.
    4. Sanctions screening systems must keep pace – Firms should ensure screening systems reflect the latest designations arising from the conflict, including secondary sanctions and sector-specific restrictions, across customers, counterparties and beneficial owners.
    5. Enterprise-wide risk assessments require updating – Risk assessments should be recalibrated to reflect the current threat landscape, including proliferation financing risks and typologies associated with terrorism financing and sanctions evasion.
    6. Governance and accountability are paramount – Senior management must demonstrate active oversight of the AML/CFT/CPF programme, with documented board engagement and clearly defined compliance roles, given the new personal liability provisions.
    7. Enforcement intensity will continue – Enforcement continues to be top of the Regulators' agenda, with nearly AED 350 million in recent fines issued by the CBUAE alone.

    To read the full article, please download the PDF.

    Dispute Resolution Insight

    PDF 2.84 MB

    Download PDF

    The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
    Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.

    Editorial Disclaimer

    Originally published before the Ashurst Perkins Coie combination. See disclaimer.