DHS Ends Automatic Work Authorization Extensions
On October 30, 2025, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published an interim final rule ending the automatic extension of Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) for certain renewal applicants.
This change has immediate implications for work authorization compliance and workforce planning.
Prior to the rule change, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) would automatically extend certain EADs based on a timely filing for renewal of authorization. During the Obama administration, renewal applicants received automatic extensions of up to 180 days past the expiration date on their EADs based on the EAD category. F-1 visa holders completing the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Optional Practical Training (OPT) program were the first group to become eligible for automatic extensions, and the policy eventually expanded to include H-4 spouses, Adjustment of Status applicants, refugees and asylees, Temporary Protected Status (TPS) holders, and self-petitioners of benefits of the Violence Against Women Act, among others.
The Biden administration lengthened certain types of automatic extensions to 540 days for eligible applications filed on or after May 4, 2022, or pending as of that date.
As of October 30, 2025, most foreign nationals who file EAD renewal applications will no longer receive automatic extensions. The Trump administration cited security concerns related to the vetting and screening of individuals receiving automatic extensions as justification for the change.
The interim final rule contains important exceptions, including:
With current processing periods for renewals generally spanning between six and 12 months, the interim final rule significantly increases the risk of a lapse in work authorization among employees.
Employers should check the status of their employees’ work authorizations and contact legal counsel as soon as possible to discuss any individuals who might be affected by the rule change. Additionally, employers should:
The information provided is not intended to be a comprehensive review of all developments in the law and practice, or to cover all aspects of those referred to.
Readers should take legal advice before applying it to specific issues or transactions.
Editorial Disclaimer
Originally published before the Ashurst Perkins Coie combination. See disclaimer.