-
Overview
-
Experience
Introduction
Margo assists clients, from individuals and privately held firms to Fortune 500 public companies, with high-stakes, complex litigation and dispute resolution.
From prelitigation to trial and appeal, Margo Casselman litigates a range of contract and commercial disputes, business torts, constitutional and other governmental-related cases, election law cases, IP disputes, and employment-related disputes. As a member of the firm’s White Collar & Investigations practice, Margo has experience defending individuals and businesses in criminal and other government investigations at the federal and state levels. She also represents clients in arbitrations and other alternative dispute resolution proceedings.
Margo has significant courtroom experience. Her recent courtroom successes include briefing and arguing a motion to dismiss in federal court, resulting in the grant of dismissal of claims with prejudice; cold examinations of witnesses in state and federal court during trial or preliminary injunction hearings; delivering the opening statement and examining a witness at an evidentiary hearing, resulting in the dismissal of a lawsuit; and leading a settlement conference before a U.S. magistrate judge in a federal civil rights case that ultimately settled favorably on the eve of trial.
Prior to joining Ashurst Perkins Coie, Margo clerked for the Hon. David G. Campbell of the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona and the Hon. Mary H. Murguia of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Margo also maintains an active pro bono practice. She has litigated Section 1983 constitutional claims to secure medical care and humane conditions for people affected by the justice system.
Education & credentials
- University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law, J.D., Order of the Coif, Articles Editor, Arizona Law Review, 2017
- Arizona State University, B.A., Business, summa cum laude, Certificate in International Business, 2014
- Arizona
- Supreme Court of the United States
- Supreme Court of Arizona
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
- U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
- Hon. Mary H. MurguiaU.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- Hon. David G. CampbellU.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
Professional recognition
Listed as a "Southwest Rising Star" by Super Lawyers, 2022-2025
Supreme Court of Arizona
Co-counsel for amicus curiae Kathy Hoffman, et al. in support of Arizonans Fed Up With Failing Healthcare's appeal from superior court's decision determining that Arizonans Fed Up With Failing Healthcare did not submit a sufficient number of valid signatures in support of initiative petition and that the 100-word description required by A.R.S. § 19-102(A) was misleading and confusing and therefore refused to certify that initiative for the 2020 general election ballot. The Arizona Supreme Court affirmed the superior court on the grounds that Arizonans Fed Up With Failing Healthcare did not submit a sufficient number of valid signatures in support of initiative petition but declined to rule on whether the 100-word description was in compliance with A.R.S. § 19-102(A); Justice Bolick wrote a concurring opinion stating that the 100-word description was not in compliance with A.R.S. § 19-102(A). (Decided March 31, 2021, No. CV-20-0233-AP/EL) ___ Ariz. ___, ___ P.3d ___ (2021)
Latest thinking
Carousel: clicking the "Previous" or "Next" button changes the content between the buttons.