Judy Jennison
Global Sector Leader, Technology
Seattle
-
Overview
-
Experience
Introduction
Judy is a strategic advisor to some of the world's most sophisticated technology companies.
Judy Jennison is an IP litigator and counselor with deep experience in applying copyright and trade secret law to new and evolving technologies.
For more than three decades, Judy has helped shape the law governing how copyright applies to new technologies. As lead counsel in Kelly v. Arriba Soft, she secured a landmark Ninth Circuit fair use ruling holding that a search engine’s display of thumbnail images was transformative and lawful. That decision became an early and influential precedent for applying copyright principles to internet technologies and helped lay the groundwork for the Ninth Circuit’s later analysis in the Perfect 10 cases. She has also worked on a number of significant precedent-setting cases, including Nintendo v. Galoob, MGM v. Grokster, Adobe v. Southern Software, Atari v. Nintendo, and United States v. Microsoft.
Today, Judy’s practice includes strategic client counseling, client relationship leadership, and innovation in legal service delivery. She was the founding chair of Ashurst Perkins Coie’s Trade Secrets Group, a co-chair of the firm’s Innovation Working Group, and a co-chair of its Diversity, Inclusion, and Opportunity Committee. She currently serves as co-chair of the firm’s Technology Sector.
Judy spent eight years in-house at Microsoft Corporation, where she led the company's Copyright and Trade Secret Group, served as associate general counsel for the Microsoft Office business, and handled significant aspects of the company's worldwide antitrust compliance efforts.
Education & credentials
- Rutgers School of Law, J.D., Managing Business Editor, Rutgers Law Review, 1991
- Smith College, A.B., Mathematics, 1986
- Washington
- California
- District of Columbia
- New Jersey
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
- U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey
- U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
- Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, Senior Attorney, 2004-2006; 2008-2011, Associate General Counsel, 2006-2008
- Perkins Coie, Menlo Park; San Francisco, CA, Partner, 2000-2003; Of Counsel, 1999
- Fenwick & West, LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Associate, 1997-1999
- Steinhart & Falconer, LLP, San Francisco, CA, Associate, 1993-1997
- Mudge, Rose, Guthrie, Alexander & Ferdon, LLP, New York, NY, Associate, 1991-1993
Professional recognition
Named by Best Lawyers in America "Trade Secrets Law Lawyer of the Year," 2023; "Copyright Law Lawyer of the Year," 2025
Listed in Best Lawyers in America: Commercial Litigation; Litigation - Intellectual Property, 2019-2026; Trade Secrets, 2023-2026; Copyright Law; Trademark Law, 2024-2026
Impact
- ChIPs, Pacific Northwest Chapter, Co-Chair
- Copyright Society of the USA, Seattle Chapter, Co-Chair
- Eastside Legal Assistance Program, Board Member and Volunteer, 2005-present; Vice President, 2009; President, 2010-2011
- Seattle Intellectual Property American Inn of Court, Master, 2010-2018
Kelly, et al. v. Arriba Soft Corp., et al.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Representation of defendant in litigation establishing fair use defense for thumbnails of copyrighted photographs in Internet search engine. 280 F.3d 934 (9th Cir. 2002)
Move, Inc. v. Zillow, Inc.
Superior Court of Washington, King County
Represented the defendant Zillow in an employment-related unfair competition / trade secrets case against its largest competitor in which the plaintiffs sought approximately $2 billion in damages. After the Court dismissed more than $1 billion of plaintiffs’ claimed damages, found in favor of Zillow on allegations of spoliation, and granted several of the client’s motions for partial summary judgment including dismissal of most of plaintiffs’ tort-based claims, case settled on what was scheduled to be the first day of trial.